Scanning Electron Microscopic Examination of Different Varieties of Oat Grains in Comparison with the Analyzed Degree of Starch Breakdown and Glycaemic Responses in Horses

Authors

  • Mandy Bochnia  Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
  • Sabine Walther  Institute for Geosciences Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
  • Hans Schenkel  Regional Office of Agricultural Chemistry, University Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany
  • Kristin Romanowski  Chair of Nutritional Physiology and Animal Nutrition, University of Rostock, Germany
  • Annette Zeyner  Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

Keywords:

starch granules, scanning electron microscope, oat grains, glycaemic response, horse

Abstract

Starch granules of different varieties of oat grains were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) in order to provide information about morphologic characteristics e.g. the surface and interconnections of the granules to evaluate a possible enzyme attack and degradation, respectively. Additional information about the analyzed degree of starch breakdown and the glycaemic responses in horses after feeding the oat grains were used as parameters for comparison. The SEM has been used as an effective tool in determination of shapes and surface structures of various starch granules, in particular the description of differences within one variety.

References

  1. Svihus, B., Uhlen, A.K., Harstad, O.M. (2005) Animal Feed Science and Technology 122, 303-320
  2. Kienzle, E., Pohlenz, J., Radicke, S. (1997): Morphology of starch digestion in the horse. J. Vet. Med. A 44, 207-221
  3. Buleon, A., Colonna, P., Planchot, V. (1998): Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. International Journal of biological Macromolecules, 23, 85-112
  4. Fuwa, H., Sugimoto, Y., Takaya, t. (1979): Scanning electron microscopy of starch granules, with or without amylase attack. Carbohydrate Res. 70, 233-238
  5. Dreher, M.L., Dreher, C.J., Berry, J.W. (1984): Starch digestibility of foods: a nutritional perspective. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 20, 47-71
  6. Colonna, P., Leloup, V., Buleon, A. (1992). Limiting factors of starch hydrolysis. European Journal of clinical nutrtion, 46, S17-S32
  7. Kienzle, E., Pohlenz, J, Radicke, S. (1998): Microscopy of starch digestion in the horse. J. Anim. Physiol. a. Anim. Nutr. 80, 213-216,
  8. Naumann C., Bassler R. (2012): Analytical Methods III Book III, Method No. 7.2.6 (VDLUFA),
  9. Romanowski, K., Vernunft, A., Orgis, A., Gottschalk, J., Einspanier, A., Furll, M., Zeyner, A. (2013) Effect of feeding different amounts of starch from crushed oats of selected varieties on the glycaemic and insulinaemic response of horses. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physio. 22, 13
  10. Oates, C.G. (1997): Towards an understanding of starch granule structure and hydrolysis. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 8, 375-382
  11. Franco, C.M.L., do Rio Preto, S.J., Ciacco, C.F. (1992). Factors that affect the enzymatic degradation of natural starch granules: effect of the size of granules, Starch/Starke, 44, 422-426
  12. Jane, J., Kasemsuwan, T., Leas, S., IA, A., Zobel, H., IL, D., Robyt, J.F. (1994) Anthology of starch granule morphology by scanning electron micrsocopy, Starch/Starke 46 (4), 121-129
  13. Englyst, K.N., Vinoy, S., Englyst, H.N., Lang., V. (2003) Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose. British Journal of Nutrition, 89, 329-339

Downloads

Published

2015-07-05

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Mandy Bochnia, Sabine Walther, Hans Schenkel, Kristin Romanowski, Annette Zeyner, " Scanning Electron Microscopic Examination of Different Varieties of Oat Grains in Comparison with the Analyzed Degree of Starch Breakdown and Glycaemic Responses in Horses, International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology(IJSRST), Online ISSN : 2395-602X, Print ISSN : 2395-6011, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp.110-113, May-June-2015.